The legal battle between the SEC and Timothy Barton has revealed several troubling issues that must be exposed. The District Court’s Appellee brief is riddled with fundamental errors that raise serious questions about due process, fairness, and judicial overreach.
As we dig deeper into the brief, it becomes clear that these mistakes have been instrumental in devastating Barton’s business empire without valid justification. Let’s examine the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its Appellee brief and explore the far-reaching implications.
1. Seizing Over 180 Entities Without Proper Evidence
One of the most egregious errors in the case has been the reckless seizure of over 180 entities controlled by Timothy Barton. The SEC, with the District Court’s approval, failed to prove any direct connection between these entities and the alleged wrongdoing. In fact, only 12 companies were even involved with lender funds. Yet, Barton’s entire business ecosystem has been unjustly dismantled, with no concrete evidence tying these entities to the allegations. Included even those entities which are closed years ago, have done no business and have no business accounts. This action is no lesser than a reckless move.
This isn’t just a mistake; it’s a destruction of legitimate businesses and livelihoods.
2. Ignoring Less Drastic Alternatives Before the Receivership
Before stripping Barton of control over his assets, the District Court should have considered less extreme alternatives such as a monitorship. However, the court bypassed these options and dove straight into a full-blown receivership. This overreach crushed Barton’s ability to operate and unnecessarily damaged his business operations, when more measured solutions were available.
“This wasn’t about protecting assets – it was a reckless move that obliterated Barton’s enterprises without cause.”
3. Violating the Department of Justice’s Stay Order
Despite a clear stay order from the Department of Justice (DOJ), the District Court proceeded with critical rulings, asset sales, and allowed the receiver to continue its operations. This violation of the DOJ’s order shows blatant disregard for due process and directly compromised Barton’s ability to defend himself in court. Worse, the stay order was designed to preserve fairness, yet it was used against Barton while he was blocked from conducting discovery to defend his case.
“A court’s job is to protect rights, not to ignore them. This violation of a DOJ stay order is a clear breach of due process.”
4. Wrongfully Classifying Commercial Loans as Securities
In a staggering legal misstep, the District Court and the SEC wrongfully classified standard commercial loans as securities. These loans, with fixed returns and interest, didn’t involve profit-sharing or investment risks, which are essential elements under the Howey test for securities. By treating these as securities, the court has misinterpreted basic legal principles, further damaging Barton’s case.
“These were simple loans, not securities. Yet, the District Court’s misclassification has far-reaching and damaging consequences for Barton.”
5. Misuse of Receivership to Conduct Discover
Rather than acting to protect the estate, the SEC and the receiver used the receivership as a backdoor to gather discovery while Barton was left defenseless. After two years of investigation, the SEC had ample opportunity to prove its case before the receivership. Instead, they waited, and after the receivership was in place, used Barton’s own funds to conduct their investigation. This is not only improper but a clear violation of Barton’s due process rights.
“Discovery was supposed to be done before destroying Barton’s businesses – not after the fact, using his own resources.”
6. No Evidence of Fraud or Harm to Investors
To date, the SEC has failed to produce any credible evidence of fraud or that investors were harmed. The District Court’s orders were based on incomplete or unproven claims. Despite multiple opportunities, no proper tracing has been conducted to show how investor funds were misappropriated. The court acted on speculation rather than fact, leading to a wrongful destruction of Barton’s assets. Further, after the collective 4 years of investigation, there is still no plan for the unsecured lenders relief.
“No evidence means no case. Yet, Barton’s entire business empire has been shattered based on unsupported allegations.”
7. Premature Sale of Assets During Appeal
During Barton’s appeal, the District Court allowed the receiver to proceed with the sale of key assets, including settlements like Somerset, Dixon Water Foundation and HNGH for mere pennies against dollar values of the properties under litigations. These sales, conducted while the case was still being reviewed, risked irreversible financial harm. Allowing sales before the appeal process concludes is not only improper but goes against the very principles of fairness.
“Selling off assets before Barton could properly appeal is reckless and unfair. The damage caused by this premature sale is permanent.”
8. Judge Starr’s Prejudgment and Bias Against Barton
One of the most glaring issues is Judge Starr’s clear bias against Barton. His repeated references to Barton’s “bad acts” throughout the proceedings showed a clear prejudgment, leading to an unfair trial. The refusal to rule on objections in a timely manner, the repeated bias in his statements, and the obvious conclusion that Barton was guilty from the outset, all demonstrate that Barton could never have received a fair trial under this judge.
“The law requires impartiality – but in Barton’s case, the judge decided his guilt before the trial even began.”
The Need for Justice is Clear
These errors in the District Court’s handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton have deprived him of his rights, destroyed his businesses, and wrongfully dismantled entities that had no connection to the allegations. It’s time for justice to prevail, and for these errors to be corrected.
Help us bring awareness to this injustice by sharing this post and ensuring that the truth about this case reaches those who need to hear it