On 11/11/23, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton ( “Defendant” or “Barton”) submits this Brief in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 02/16/24, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton objects to the Receiver’s Notice of Intended Auction of Contents of 2999 Turtle Creek Blvd. [Dkt. 459] (“Notice”). Defendant
On 03/02/23, Receiver attached this Appendix with DKT 167.
In yet another display of bureaucratic resistance, Barton, who is required to seek permission to travel outside Texas, submitted a formal request to do so.
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
