On 10/19/23, The Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) attached this Exhibit with DKT 361.
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 08/31/23, The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The Court withdraw our previous opinion, reported at 72 F.4th 64, and substitute the following: Barton
On 11/28/22, Defendant Timothy L. Barton moves for this Court to stay its Order Appointing Receiver [ECF No. 29], its Order Granting Receiver’s Motion to
On 08/14/23, In accordance with the Receivership Order, the Receiver has provided the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) a complete copy of the proposed
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
