DKT 76 RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF APPRAISERS, APPROVAL OF APPRAISALS OF ROCK CREEK PROPERTY, AND SETTING HEARING REGARDING APPROVAL OF SALE OF ROCK CREEK PROPERTY

On 12/02/22, With the “Receivership Order” and 28 U.S.C. § 2001, the Receiver requests appointment of three appraisers, approval of the appraisals, and a hearing regarding approval of the sale of certain property.

Download File

Related News

8 Critical Errors Made by the District Court in the SEC Case Against Timothy Barton

Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.

DKT 92 APPENDIX IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT TIMOTHY BARTON’S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SALE OF ROCK CREEK PROPERTY [ECF NO. 76], AND CROSS-MOTION FOR ORDER PROHIBITING SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT ROCK CREEK HOME

On 12/13/22, Defendant Timothy Barton Filed this Appendix Attached with DKT 91.

DKT 497 ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER’S MOTION TO RATIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SOMERSET-LOST CREEK GOLF, LTD AND THE BERYL ARTZ BYPASS TRUST

On 05/24/24, Receiver’s motion to ratify the settlement agreement with Somerset-Lost Creek Golf, LTD and the Beryl Artz Bypass Trust. (Doc. 487). The SEC is

DKT 215 SOUTHERN PROPERTIES CAPITAL, LTD’S MOTION TO STRIKE RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH RESPECT TO PARC AT INGLESIDE AND PARC AT OPELIKA

On 04/24/23, Southern Properties Capital, Ltd. (“SPC”) files this Motion to Strike Receiver’s Motion for Summary Judgment with Respect to Parc at Ingleside and Parc

DKT 558 RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR “SHOW CAUSE” HEARING, SANCTIONS, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear

DKT 548 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTIONS FOR EXEMPTION FROM RECEIVERSHIP AND JUDGMENT

On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,