On 12/09/22, Cort Thomas, as Receiver, responds to Barton’s Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (the “Motion”) [Dkt. 71].
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 12/20/22, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Appendix in Support of his Response in opposition to the Receiver’s Verified Motion To Ratify Agreement With
On 03/21/23, Cortney C. Thomas, attached this Appendix with DKT 199.
On 07/10/24, In support of two pending motions [Dkts. 500 and 502] (the “Motions”), Cort Thomas, as the court-appointed Receiver, files this Consolidated Reply to
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
