On 12/13/22, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Reply in support of his Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [ECF No. 71] (“Motion”)
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 06/05/24, Receiver attached this Appendix with DKT 500.
On 07/27/24, Receiver submit this Appendix with DKT 539
In the SEC’s ongoing case against Timothy Barton, Venus Development has emerged as a property of significant value and potential. Situated in a desirable area
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
