On 02/22/23, The Receiver requests appointment of three appraisers, approval of the appraisals, a hearing regarding approval of the sale of certain property, and, ultimately, the approval of the sale.
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
On 03/19/23, Receiver’s First Quarterly Fee Application. [Doc. No. 156]. Which Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) does not oppose but Defendant Timothy Barton does.
On 05/11/23, Southern Properties Capital, Ltd. (“SPC”) files this Reply to Receiver’s Response to SPC’S Motion to Strike Receiver’s Motion for Summary Judgment with Respect
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 04/26/24, Cort Thomas, the Court-appointed Receiver, responds to the Request for Judgement [sic] Regarding Venus59, LLC filed by Daniel Crow (“Crow”) [Dkt. 485].
