DKT 227 RECEIVER’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT BARTON’S OBJECTION TO RECEIVER’S NOTICE OF INTENDED AUCTION OF CONTENTS OF 2999 TURTLE CREEK BLVD, AND MOTION TO STRIKE CROSS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

On 05/03/23, Cort Thomas, as Receiver, responds to Barton’s Objection to the Receiver’s Notice of Intended Sale (the “Objection”) and also moves to strike Barton’s Cross-Motion for a Preliminary Injunction staying the auction, (Dkt. 223).

Download File

Related News

8 Critical Errors Made by the District Court in the SEC Case Against Timothy Barton

Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.

DKT 551 ORDER

On 08/14/24, Southern Star Capital, LLC’s (Southern Star”) motion to modify a stay order. (Doc. 498). After reviewing the motion, response, reply, and applicable law,

DKT 513 RECEIVER’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF VERIFIED MOTION TO RATIFY SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH TAMAMOI, LLC AND 3820 ILLINOIS, LLC

On 06/18/24, Cort Thomas as the court-appointed Receiver files this Reply in Support of his Verified Motion to Ratify Settlement Agreement with Tamamoi, LLC and

DKT 117 REPLY OF HNGH TURTLE CREEK, LLC, TO DEFENDANT TIMOTHY BARTON’S OPPOSITION [95] TO MOTION TO INTERVENE AND TO CONFIRM OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2999 TURTLE CREEK BOULEVARD [69]

On 12/29/22, HNGH replies to DKT 95 and support DKT 70, Consistent with the original Receivership Order, the binding bankruptcy judgments preceding it, and settled

DKT 558 RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR “SHOW CAUSE” HEARING, SANCTIONS, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear

DKT 548 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTIONS FOR EXEMPTION FROM RECEIVERSHIP AND JUDGMENT

On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,