On 12/20/22, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Response in opposition to the Receiver’s Verified Motion to Ratify Agreement with DLP Capital and Other DLP Entities [ECF No. 95] (“Motion”).
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
Flawed Justifications for Receivership Inclusion It is critical to highlight that no funds from Chinese investors or disputed sources were used in the acquisition or
On 09/23/22, The Plaintiff SEC submitted CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS and qouted as SEC is unaware of any person or entity who has a financial
On 09/24/23, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton respectfully requests an eight-day extension of time to file a response to the Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
