On 03/02/23, Mr. Barton respectfully asks the Court to abstain in ruling on the Receiver’s initial motion (ECF No. 133) or as to the new relief sought in the Receiver’s reply (ECF No. 166), until Mr. Barton has had an opportunity to respond by sur-reply.
8 Critical Errors Made by the District Court in the SEC Case Against Timothy Barton
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.