On 03/07/23, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Response in opposition to the Receiver’s First Quarterly Fee Application [ECF No. 156] (“Application”), and requests a hearing on this matter.
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 12/07/22, The “Max Barton Entities”; and TC Hall, LLC, Titan 2022 Investment, LLC, Marine Creek SP, LLC, and LC Aledo TX, LLC (the “Additional
On 10/09/23, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton files this Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, In Limine regarding the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s
On 07/10/24, In support of two pending motions [Dkts. 500 and 502] (the “Motions”), Cort Thomas, as the court-appointed Receiver, files this Consolidated Reply to
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
