DKT 213 RECEIVER’S NOTICE OF INTENDED AUCTION OF CONTENTS OF 2999 TURTLE CREEK BLVD

On 04/21/23, In accordance with the provisions of the Order Granting Motion For Order Governing Administration Of Receivership Estate, Etc. And Approving Disposition of Certain Personal Property (the “Admin Order”), Dkt. 63, Cort Thomas, the court-appointed Receiver in this case, provides notice.

Download File

Related News

8 Critical Errors Made by the District Court in the SEC Case Against Timothy Barton

Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.

DKT 565 DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR “SHOW CAUSE” HEARING, SANCTIONS & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

On 09/13/2024, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton respectfully requests a two-day extension of time to file his response to the Receiver’s “Motion for “Show Cause” Hearing,

DKT 68 NONPARTY BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.’S FIRST AMENDED CERTIFIED STATEMENT

On 11/21/22, Nonparty Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) files this First Amended Certified Statement in compliance with paragraph 15(C) of the Court’s Order

DKT 541 DEFENDANT BARTON’S RESPONSE TO RECEIVER’S VERIFIED MOTION TO RATIFY BM318, LLC’S SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS WITH THE DIXON WATER FOUNDATION AND LUMAR LAND & CATTLE, LLC AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

On 07/29/24, Defendant Timothy Barton files this Response in opposition to the Receiver’s Verified Motion to Ratify BM318, LLC’s Settlement Agreements with the Dixon Water

DKT 558 RECEIVER’S MOTION FOR “SHOW CAUSE” HEARING, SANCTIONS, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT

On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear

DKT 548 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTIONS FOR EXEMPTION FROM RECEIVERSHIP AND JUDGMENT

On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,