On 06/05/23, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Opposition to the Receiver’s Second Quarterly Fee Application [ECF No. 237], and requests a hearing on this matter.
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 11/01/22, Receiver filed this Appendix with DKT 41 which contain DECLARATION OF CORTNEY C. THOMAS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP ORDER.
In the ongoing legal case of SEC vs. Timothy Barton, several real estate assets have become focal points, one of which is the HUD Apartments.
On 12/09/22, Cort Thomas, as Receiver, responds to Barton’s Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (the “Motion”) [Dkt. 71].
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
