Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 05/15/24, Cort Thomas, as the court-appointed Receiver (“Receiver”), files this Partially Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth
On 04/18/23, Cortney C. Thomas, as the court-appointed (“Receiver”), requests an order confirming that Case Number DC-22-02622, JMJ Development, LLC v. Tamamoi, LLC et al.,
On 11/15/23, Defendant Timothy Lynch Barton (the “Defendant” or “Barton”) files this Opposition to the Receiver’s Expedited Motion to Amend Order Supplementing Receivership Order and
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
