On 11/28/22, Defendant Timothy L. Barton files this Appendix in Support of his Motion to Stay Pending Appeal (DKT 71).
Learn about the 8 critical errors made by the District Court in its handling of the SEC case against Timothy Barton. These mistakes violated due process, destroyed businesses, and wrongly accused an innocent man.
On 05/08/23, Defendant Timothy Barton opposes the Receiver’s Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement with HNGH Turtle Creek, LLC (“Motion”) [ECF No. 210], and requests a
On 04/19/24, Receiver’s motion for leave to file complaints against third parties (Doc. 472) is GRANTED.
On 09/12/23, McCormick 101, LLC (“McCormick”) and files this Motion (1) to Lift Stay and (2) for Exception from the Court’s Order Appointing Receiver [Doc.
On 08/23/24, Receiver Cortney C. Thomas (the “Receiver”) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a “Show Cause Hearing” compelling Defendant Timothy Barton (“Barton”) to appear
On 08/14/24, Two motions from Daniel Crow pertaining to Venus 59, LLC (“Venus 59”). In both motions, Crow argues he owns 90% of Venus 59,
