
THE UNTOLD STORY BEHIND THE SEC’S OVERREACH
In the fall of 2022, before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ever filed a formal complaint, Mr. Barton’s legal team submitted a detailed
In the fall of 2022, before the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ever filed a formal complaint, Mr. Barton’s legal team submitted a detailed
The correspondence between Receiver Cort Thomas and Tim Barton, the defense in an ongoing receivership case, reveals a disturbing pattern of deliberate delays, lack of
The aggressive legal actions against Timothy Barton, including abrupt asset seizures and sales at undervalued prices, have raised profound concerns about the fairness of the
In an age where transparency and accountability in government spending are paramount, a critical question emerges: why is the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Exposing the Political Witch Hunt: Lawfare Against Timothy Barton The unfolding legal battle surrounding Timothy Barton, a prominent real estate developer and business associate of
The Malicious Prosecutor and the DLP Settlement The Receiver, acting as a malicious prosecutor under oath, declared in a court hearing that his mandate is
Legal Overreach or Preserving Justice? The Rock Creek property is not merely a financial asset; it represents a family’s sanctuary and cherished memories. The receiver’s
Timothy Barton 3926 Vista Woods Carrollton, TX 75007 Phone: 214-673-8714 Email: timothy.barton@proton.me May 5, 2025 Office of the Circuit Executive Judicial Council of the Fifth
In a chilling case that lays bare the ongoing weaponization of government, Timothy Barton, a patriotic Texan businessman, long-time Trump supporter, and Christian real estate developer, is fighting for his life long business — and for the constitutional rights of every American.
Timothy Barton has filed a Motion for More Definite Statement in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, challenging the Tenth Quarterly Report submitted by the court-appointed receiver. Barton argues the report lacks financial transparency, contains misleading accusations, and fails to provide essential financial disclosures. His legal team insists that the defense demands transparency and is calling for a court-ordered revision to ensure accurate reporting and judicial accountability. This case highlights broader concerns about receivership overreach, due process, and asset management transparency—setting a crucial precedent for future legal disputes.